Checklist Service Review Report: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
< | <itpmch><title>Checklist Service Review Report | IT Process Wiki</title> | ||
<meta name="keywords" content="service review report, service review checklist, service review template" /> | |||
<meta name="description" content="The Service Review Report contains the results and findings from a Service Review. This report is an important input for the definition ..." /> | |||
</itpmch> | |||
<imagemap> | <imagemap> | ||
Image:ITIL-Wiki-de-es.jpg|DE - ES - Checklist Service Review Report - Template Service Review Report|100px | Image:ITIL-Wiki-de-es.jpg|DE - ES - Checklist Service Review Report - Template Service Review Report|100px | ||
Line 8: | Line 11: | ||
<br style="clear:both;"/> | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
<p> </p> | |||
'''ITIL Process''': [[ITIL CSI - Continual Service Improvement|ITIL 2011 CSI - Continual Service Improvement]] - [[Service Review|Service Review]] | |||
'''ITIL Process''': [[ITIL | |||
'''Checklist Category:''' [[ITIL-Checklists#ITIL 2011 Templates|Templates ITIL 2011]] - Continual Service Improvement | '''Checklist Category:''' [[ITIL-Checklists#ITIL 2011 Templates|Templates ITIL 2011]] - Continual Service Improvement | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
===<span id="Service Review Template">Overview</span>=== | |||
The ''Service Review Report'' is a document containing the results and findings from a [[Service Review|Service Review]]. This report is an important input for the [[Definition of Improvement Initiatives|definition of improvement initiatives]]. | The ''Service Review Report'' is a document containing the results and findings from a [[Service Review|Service Review]]. This report is an important input for the [[Definition of Improvement Initiatives|definition of improvement initiatives]]. | ||
Line 24: | Line 28: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Service Review Report - Contents == | ==Service Review Report - Contents== | ||
''The following information is typically recorded within the Service Review Report:'' | ''The following information is typically recorded within the Service Review Report:'' | ||
Line 30: | Line 34: | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
====Name==== | |||
(Name of the IT service under review) | (Name of the IT service under review) | ||
====Date and time of the review==== | |||
====Time period==== | |||
(Time period covered by the review) | (Time period covered by the review) | ||
====Person in charge==== | |||
# Person in charge of the review | # Person in charge of the review | ||
====Participants of the Service Review Meeting==== | |||
# Business and user representatives | # Business and user representatives | ||
# Service provider representatives | # Service provider representatives | ||
====Service levels==== | |||
(Summary presentation of agreed vs. achieved service levels) | (Summary presentation of agreed vs. achieved service levels) | ||
====Report on exceptional situations==== | |||
====Customer satisfaction==== | |||
Satisfaction regarding service quality on the client-side: | Satisfaction regarding service quality on the client-side: | ||
# Compliments | # Compliments | ||
# Complaints | # Complaints | ||
====Room for improvement==== | |||
Areas which must be addressed by improvement initiatives (resulting in changes to the service and/ or to its underlying processes, or to customer agreements): | Areas which must be addressed by improvement initiatives (resulting in changes to the service and/ or to its underlying processes, or to customer agreements): | ||
# From the customer viewpoint: New or changed requirements for the service | # From the customer viewpoint: New or changed requirements for the service | ||
Line 68: | Line 72: | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<html><a rel="author" href="https://plus.google.com/111925560448291102517"><img style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;" src="/skins/Vector/images/itpm/bookmarking/gplus.png" width="16" height="16" title="By: Stefan Kempter | Profile on Google+" alt="Author: Stefan Kempter, IT Process Maps GbR" /></a></html> | |||
<!-- This page is assigned to the following categories: --> | <!-- This page is assigned to the following categories: --> |
Revision as of 15:31, 3 August 2013
ITIL Process: ITIL 2011 CSI - Continual Service Improvement - Service Review
Checklist Category: Templates ITIL 2011 - Continual Service Improvement
Source: Checklist "Service Review Report" from the ITIL Process Map
Overview
The Service Review Report is a document containing the results and findings from a Service Review. This report is an important input for the definition of improvement initiatives.
Service Review Report - Contents
The following information is typically recorded within the Service Review Report:
Name
(Name of the IT service under review)
Date and time of the review
Time period
(Time period covered by the review)
Person in charge
- Person in charge of the review
Participants of the Service Review Meeting
- Business and user representatives
- Service provider representatives
Service levels
(Summary presentation of agreed vs. achieved service levels)
Report on exceptional situations
Customer satisfaction
Satisfaction regarding service quality on the client-side:
- Compliments
- Complaints
Room for improvement
Areas which must be addressed by improvement initiatives (resulting in changes to the service and/ or to its underlying processes, or to customer agreements):
- From the customer viewpoint: New or changed requirements for the service
- Changes in business processes or strategy which lead to new functional requirements
- Changes in risk perceptions, priorities and criticalities which lead to changed Service Level Targets
- Anticipated changes in service consumption, short term as well as medium and long-term
- Required short-term modifications (e.g. due to current/ recent problems)
- Changed requirements with respect to service level reporting
- From the IT viewpoint
- Areas where service quality is to be improved
- Conceivable cost-optimizations, e.g. by using new technologies or optimizing processes, or by influencing service demand